How complicated do your monitors have to be?
How to collect royalties from your music
Make an attention-getting lo-fi introduction for a track
The new battlefield in the loudness war?
Spend $3600 on a microphone, then find that your recordings are no better than before
The worst-sounding hit record ever?
Comment of the week: Just how hard is it to 'get into the groove'?
"Welcome to My World" by Kevin Michael Kappler
The Waves CLA-76 compressor plug-in on snare drum, with video
Avid's new upgrades - great for mere 'content production'
I couldn't believe it. I stared at my computer screen in awe as the votes came in...
One after another, vote after vote for the same track in the creativity competition. Then it stopped, and votes started coming in just seconds apart for another track.
Doubtless you have seen the results so far, with a couple of tracks well in the lead. But the chart is massively skewed by the fake votes.
It would be easy to think that a couple of composers are voting for their own tracks, but I feel that it is much more likely that a few second-rate hackers have seen this as an opportunity to 'beat the system'. I'll bet they laughed and laughed when they found how easily it could be done.
Except it's not so easy.
When I set up the competition, it did of course occur to me that multiple votes could be a problem. Top shows like Pop Idol and American Idol have the same problem too where contestants get their friends and relatives to vote. It doesn't matter to the producers because every vote brings them more money - so who cares if they are fake?
But I didn't think that a competition without a prize other than exposure would be subject to foul play. Even so, I had a simple security measure put into the voting system that prevented multiple votes, just in case of temptation.
But the temptation was clearly too strong and second-rate hackers found a way round the security precautions.
But why do I call these hackers 'second rate'? Simple - because their work shows up plain as day in the voting logs. I can look at the looks and easily see which are the rigged votes.
So rest assured, by next week the rigged votes will have been filtered and the genuine result available.
By the way, I've had the system set so that anyone can vote again, but of course only once, unless you cheat. If you really want to cheat, get your friends and relatives to vote for you in the traditional way.
But the whole point of the competition was not to cheat in the first place. Hmm... I wonder if any of those tracks used sources other than the specified sine wave and white noise?
What do you think? Are there any imposters?