Facebook social media iconTwitter social media iconInstagram social media iconSubmit to Reddit

An Introduction to Compression: Basic Compression - A free download from Audio Masterclass

An Introduction to Equalization - A free download from Audio Masterclass

Equipping Your Home Recording Studio - A free download from Audio Masterclass

Look in the mirror - are you your own worst enemy?

For beginners - Why do your loudspeakers have holes in them?

Can curtains provide good soundproofing?

Tascam brings Portastudio to the iPad

Retro recording: How to get more tracks through bouncing and track sharing

Jensen releases Jet Falcon 10"

"Tonight by Georgina Moffat (excerpt)" by Atomic Studios London

How to achieve a huge bass drum sound with EQ, reverb and compression

Drop-In Stratocaster Pickguards Give You 35 Pickup Tones To Find Your Signature Sound

Spend $3600 on a microphone, then find that your recordings are no better than before

Publishing deal or record deal?

It used to be that an aspiring artist or band writing their own songs would initially approach a music publisher with a view to getting a publishing contract. The publisher would put up money for living expenses and demos, then when the artist or band was ready, they would promote them to record companies. Now apparently you can't get a publishing deal for love nor money

It used to be that an aspiring artist or band writing their own songs would initially approach a music publisher with a view to getting a publishing contract. The publisher would put up money for living expenses and demos, then when the artist or band was ready, they would promote them to record companies.

Now apparently you can't get a publishing deal for love nor money. The reason? Record companies now bypass the intermediate role of the publisher and seek out and develop acts themselves. They do all the same work and pay the same advances upfront, so in this respect they are indeed fulfilling the publisher's role.

But there is something else. A publishing deal would normally take a 40% slice out of the artist's or band's songwriting royalties. The record companies have now realized they can take this slice for themselves.

Since record companies are doing the publisher's initial work, surely this is fair?

Well actually not...

The traditional role of the publisher did not end when the act was signed to a record company. It extended into promoting their songs to other performers as cover versions, promotion to television producers, film, and - most importantly - TV commercials.

From this, the publisher would make loads of money for the writers, they would both get their fair shares, and the band would derive additional and separate income from record sales.

Unfortunately, the record companies are far too busy selling records (and downloads) to bother about this additional source of income, which largely goes unexploited.

In fact the people who are exploiting this revenue stream are the publishers who, starved of new talent, promote their back catalog to the hilt.

And the record companies? It's oh so sad. Once upon a time film production companies would pay to use a song in their movie. Now, the record companies have to pay them to get a song featured, simply so they can sell records off the back of that.

Traditional music publishers are by no means starving. And right now they are laughing at record companies' meager efforts. They know their turn will come again.

This article was inspired by a conversation with producer Dave Allen.

By David Mellor Wednesday May 3, 2006